UIJRT » United International Journal for Research & Technology

The Influence of Administrative Culture and Political Pressure Towards Accountability through e-Government South Sulawesi Regional Government

Jamaluddin Majid, Mediaty, Hamid Habbe and Harryanto

Total Views / Downloads: 30 

Cite ➜

Majid, J., Mediaty, Habbe, H. and Harryanto, 2021. The Influence of Administrative Culture and Political Pressure Towards Accountability through e-Government South Sulawesi Regional Government. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 2(8), pp.111-122.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of administrative culture and political pressure on accountability through e-government. Administrative culture in government accountability is important in supporting the achievement of good governance for the local government of South Sulawesi. Because the state apparatus with good administrative culture behavior and political support will affect the accountability of government performance. The research uses an explanatory method that examines the causal relationship with the theory used to answer the problem. Methods Data collection using a questionnaire in the local government of South Sulawesi. The results of the structural model analysis show that administrative culture and political pressure have a significant effect on accountability.

Keywords: Administrative Culture, Political Pressure, Accountability and e-Government.

References

  1. Abdullah, J., 2018. Effect of Application sion Value For Money Against Accountability of Public atthe Department of Health District Pohuwato. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 1 (1): 10-20.
  2. Abdalrahman, EMA., 2015. Design and Implementation of electronic Accounting Systems for  Sudan E-Government International. Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology Research. 3(2): 1093-1103.
  3. Al-Shehri, Mohammed and Drew Steve., 2010. E-Government Fundamentals. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference ICT. 20 ( 5 ):34-42.
  4. Andersen, S. C & MLF Jakobsen., 2018. Political Pressure, Conformity Pressure and Performance Information as Drivers of Public Sector Innovation Adoption. Journal homepage, 22(8): 1-62.
  5. Arifin, SP, & Putra, YE., 2016. E-Government Model At the Regional Administration of Government Level Village . Journal of Applied Computers, 2 (1):7-16.
  6. Arjita, UA,. 2017. E-Government As part In the Smart City. 2nd National Seminar on Applied Science and Technology (SENIT) 2017. 167:170
  7. Assar, S., Boughzala, I and Boydens, I., 2011. Back to Practice, a Decade of Research in E-Government in “Practical Studies in E-Government: Best Practice from around the world”, Eds. New York, USA: Springer
  8. Avison D and Wood-Harper T., 2003. Bringing Social and Organizational Issues into Information System Development: The Story of Multiview, in Socio-Technical and Human Cognition Elements of Information Systems, Eds., IGI Global
  9. Azlina, N., and Amelia, I., 2014. Effects of Good Governance and Control of Internal Against Performance Government of the District Palalawan. Journal of Accounting, University of Jember, 12 (2).
  10. Belanger, FL Carter., 2012. Digitizing Government Interactions with Constituents: A Historical Review of E-Government Research in Information Systems. JAAIS , 13(5): 363-394.
  11. Bolívar, MPR, Munoz, LA, & Hernández, AML., 2012. Studying e-government: Research methodologies, data compilation techniques and future outlook. Academia. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración , (51): 79-95.
  12. Brennan, G., & Buchanan, JM., 1980. The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution . Cambridge University Press.
  13. Cahyadi, Adi,. 2003. E-Government: An Overview of Concepts and Problems . Journal of The WINNERS , 4(1):1-12.
  14. Chin, WW., 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In GA Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Dunu, I., 2013. Governance in Nigeria: What is the Role for Medi. European Scientific Journal , 9(32) : 857-7881.
  16. Elysia, V., A. Wihadanto, and Sumartono., 2015. Implementation of E-Government to Promote Public Services are Integrated in Indonesia. Optimizing the Role of Science and Technology to Realize Smart City, 1(1): 354-380.
  17. Fiedler, Fred E., 1967. A Theory of Learning Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  18. Fjelde, MHA Hegre., 2007. Political Corruption and Institutional Stability. Center for the Study of Civil War . 10:1-30.
  19. Geeraert, A., Mrkonjic, M., & Chappelet , JL., 2015. A rationalist perspective on the autonomy of international sport governing bodies: towards a pragmatic autonomy in the steering of sports. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 7 (4).
  20. Haldenwang, CV,. 2004. Electronic Government (E-Government) and Development. The European Journal of Development Research, 16(2): 417-432.
  21. Hardjaloka, L. 2014.. A study on the application of e-Government in Indonesia and other countries as a solution for eradicating corruption in the public sector. Journal of Rechts Vinding : National Law Development Media , 3 (3):435-452.
  22. Hasayangan, YY,. 2016. Performance Improvement Strategy Non-Traditional Markets. Journal of Sustainable Technology (Sustainable Technology Journal). 5(1): 42-48
  23. Hasibuan, ZA and Santoso., 2005. Standardization of Applications E-Government for Government Agencies. Proceedings of the Indonesian National Information and Communication Technology Conference. ITB.
  24. Heeks,. 2006. Implementing and Managing e-Government An International Text. London, England: SAGE Publications
  25. Hersey, P., and Blanchard, K., 1969. Life cycle theory of leadership. Training and Development Journal, 23, 26-35.
  26. Holle, S.H., 2011. Public Services Through Electronic Government: Efforts to Minimize Maladministration Practices in Improving Public Service. Sasi Journal.17;13 :21-29.
  27. House, RJ., 1971. A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly , 16:321-338.
  28. Husain, YS and Samiruddin., 2013. Impact of Quality of Human Resources in Behavior in Organizational Performance Effectiveness. International Journal of Science and Research. 5(2): 881-885.
  29. Indrajit, Richardus Eko., 2002. Electronic government: strategy for building and developing a public service system based on digital technology. Yogyakarta: ANDI Publisher.
  30. Juiz, CC Guerrero and , I. Lera., 2014. implementing the Principles of Accountability for Information Technology Public Sector Governance framework. Open Journal of Accounting, (3) 9-27.
  31. Charisma, B., 2014. Accountability As A Concept and Why is Important in the Public and Private Sector: An Economic Institutional Approach. Journal of Economic Studies Bulletin . 19(1): 1-34.
  32. , T., (2013). Evaluation of budgeting based on performance through the performance of finance are based on value for money in the districts/cities in Java East . Journal of Accounting Dynamics, 5 (1): 1-11
  33. Latif, F and D. Mutiarin., 2016. Transparency Management of Budget Regions In Unit Work Tool (SKPD) Bulukumba District Year 2014. Journal of Governance and Public Policy , 3(2) : 245-255
  34. Lent, LV., 1997. Pressure and Politics in Financial Accounting Regulation: The Case of the Financial Conglomerates in The Netherlands. 33 ( 1 ): 1-26.
  35. Locke, EA., 1968. Toward a Theory of Task Motivation and Incentives. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 3 (2): 157-189
  36. Majid, Jamaluddin. mediaty. Hamid Habib. Harryanto., (2020). Government Budget Policy Related To Lockdown Sovid19; A Political Pressure Study. Scientific Journal of Civilization Accounting. https://doi.org/jiap.v6i
  37. Marani, Y., 2002. Motivation and Delegation of Authority As Variable Moderating In a Relationship Between Participation Preparation of Budget With Managerial Performance. 11(1): 46-56.
  38. Mistry, J. and A. Jalal., 2012. empirical analysis of the relationship between e-Government and corruption. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 12(1): 145-176.
  39. Mufarrohah, Sutrisno and B. Purnomosidhi., 2013. The influence of organizational culture, leadership style and competence on local government performance. Infestation Journal, 9(2):123-236.
  40. Nalarreason, KM, Atmadja, AT, Adiputra, IMP., 2014. Influence of Good Governance and Competence Resources Power Man Against the Implementation of the Budget Based Performance At the Department of Revenue Regional District of Buleleng. JIMAT (Accounting Student Scientific Journal) Undiksha, 2 (1).
  41. Nawawi, J., 2012. Building Trust in Realizing Accountability. Scientific Journal of Government Science , 1(3): 19-29.
  42. Nkwe, N., 2012. E-Government: Challenges and Opportunities in Botswana. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences , 2(17) ;39 -48.
  43. Nor Farizal,. Mohammed Kamran Ahmed Xu-Dong Ji., 2017. Accounting Conservatism, Corporate Governance and Political Connections, 25 (2): 1-46.
  44. Oktavya, AA., 2015. Application of (Electronic Government) e-Government at the Primary Tax Service Office in the Provision of Services in Bontang City. Government Science e-Journal , 3(3): 1433-1447
  45. Pe’rez, CC,. 2008. E-Government Process and Incentives for Online Public Financial Information. Journal is available at, 32(3): 379-400.
  46. , DPA & Setyaningrum, D., 2017. The effect of governance and e-Government on corruption . EQUITY (Journal of Economics and Finance), 1 (4): 431-450.
  47. Retno,. R D., 2012. Effects of Good Corporate Governance and Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Against Value Company, 1 (2): 85-103
  48. , 2008. The Role of E-Government in Achieving Accountability for the Community 1(5): 205-211
  49. Rohayatin, TT,. Warsito, Personal,. Nurmandi, W. Kumorotmo and Suranto., 2017. Factors Cause Not Optimally Quality Implementation Services Public In the Bureaucratic Government . Journal of Caraka Prabu , 1(1): 22-36.
  50. Sa’adah, B., 2015. Accountability and Transparency Budget Through E-Government (Study of Budgeting in Government Regional District Blitar). Public Policy and Management, 3(2): 1-10
  51. Sarker, MNI, Bingxin. A, Sultana and A, S. Prodhan., 2017. The problems and challenges of public administration in Bangladesh: the path to sustainable development. International Journal of Public Administration, 3(1): 016-025.
  52. Serfianus, A. Djumlani and D. Paranoan., 2014. Behavioral Bureaucracy In Providing Public Services . Ejournal Administrative Reform, 2(3): 1705-1718.
  53. Suryani and Hendryadi., 2015. Quantitative Research Methods: Theory and Applications in Research in Management and Islamic Economics. Jakarta: Pradana Media Group.
  54. Suntharalingam, V. Z, Hassan., 2016. Impact of Accountability on international trade in Sub-Saharan African countries. International Journal of Accounting & Business Management, 4(2): 2289-4519.
  55. , U., 2017. Effect of External Pressure, Factor Politics, Environmental Uncertainty Commitment Leadership and Competency Resources Power Man Against the application of transparency Reporting Financial (Empirical Study at SKPD District Kampar), 4 (1): 178-192.
  56. Whitton, H., 2007. Developing the “Ethical Competence” of Public Officials a Capacity-Building Approach. Viesoji Politica Ir Administrativimas, 21: 49-60.
  57. Zeyn, E., 2011. Effect of Accountability and Standards Accounting for Government Against Accountability Finance with the commitment of the Organization as a moderating. Journal of Accounting and Finance Review, 1(1): 21-37. , MVM and and R, C. Fernandes., 2015. E-Services In E-Government Bibliometric Analysis Of International Articles. 7(2):43-62.

For Conference & Paper Publication​

UIJRT Publication - International Journal