UIJRT » United International Journal for Research & Technology

Analytical Perspectives on Green Finance and Corporate Social Responsibility

Dr. Sunil Bhagwanji Kapadia

Total Views / Downloads: 63 

Cite ➜

Kapadia, S.B., 2021. Analytical Perspectives on Green Finance and Corporate Social Responsibility. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 2(3), pp.37-48.


Finance is strengthened in support of financial and individual capital, but frequently we highlight the former at the expense of the latter. As subscribers elsewhere to these essays correctly proclaim, bringing green and sustainable finance requires fastening together of considerable and noteworthy changes right across our economic structure, and indeed in business and society more broadly.

The central bank is chiefly responsible for financial and macroeconomic stability; hence, it must address climate-related and other environmental perils on a well-ordered level. Additionally, central banks, by their regulatory control over credit, money, and the financial system, are in a mighty stand to promote the evolution of green finance models and administer a reasonably sufficient assessment of surroundings and carbon perils by monetary bodies.

Banking institutions have increased their social responsibility practices to reinforce their credibility and the trust their stakeholders have in them. Altogether, we examine the relationship between these two-vastness differentiating between environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) actions as well as among nations considering legal systems, the level of development, and the geographic area.

Setting out the Asian economies onto a maintainable path of gradual growth requires an unrivaled rearranging in distancing it from fossil fuel, greenhouse gas, and natural resource all-inclusive sector to high resource productive technologies and business models. The economy will have to play a primary role in this ‘green evolution’.

Emerging market multinational enterprises (EM-MNEs) progressively use corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting as a universal legitimation plan and it is created by their dual embeddedness in their domestic states and the universal institutional surroundings. Although there are hardly any information/facts about when their CSR reporting is dissociated from their CSR fulfillment.

Keywords: Green finance, Corporate social responsibility (CSR), Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG).


  1. Alshehhi, Ali, Haitham Nobanee, and Nilesh Khare, (2018). The Effect of Maintainability Theories on Corporate Financial Outcome: Literature Tendencies and Potential in Further Investigation. Sustainability 10: 494. [Cross Ref]
  2. Terlaak, S. Kim & T. Roh, (May-2018). Not Good, Not Bad: The Effect of Family Control on Environmental Performance Disclosure by Business Group Firms. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3911-5.
  3. Andreas B., Wolfgang P. & Helene S., (2019). The Potential Contribution to Green Finance from Central Banks. Leibniz Information Centre for Economics with German Institute of Economic Research (DIW Berlin). ECONSTOR. http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/vjh.88.2.55.
  4. (April 2019). A call for action. Climate change as a source of financial risk: First comprehensive report. NGFS 2019a
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre, (1986). The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Edited by John G. Richardson. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–58.
  6. Borrone, dkk, (2010). Bisnis keluarga berpendapat bahwa titik referensi dari keluarga pemegang saham – manajer adalah untuk mempertahankan hubungan sosioemosional, yang menjelaskan mengapa keluarga bisnis mengambil keputusan yang tidak mengikuti logika sepenuhnya.
  7. Blaxekjær & Nielsen, (2015). ”Beyond 2015: Exploring the Future of Global Climate Governance”. Mapping the narrative positions of new political groups under the UNFCCC.
  8. Commission for Architecture and The Built Environment, (2005). Physical Capital: How Great Places Boost Public Value; High Street Epsom: Ernest Bond Printing Ltd., pp. 1–75.
  9. Chen, Noble, I.; Hellmann, J.; Coffee, J.; Murillo, M.; Chawla, N., (2015). University of Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index. Country Index Technical Report. ND-GAIN.
  10. Charlo, Maria J., Ismael Moya, and Ana M Munoz, (2015). Maintainable Growth and Corporate Economic Outcome: Findings on the FTSE basis for Good IBEX Index. Business Strategy and the Environment. 24: 277–88. [Cross Ref]
  11. Campiglio, E., (2016): “Beyond Carbon Pricing. The Role of Banking and Monetary Policy in Financing the Transition to a Low-carbon Economy”, Ecological Economics121, 220–230.
  12. Charlo, Maria J., Ismael Moya, and Ana M Munoz, (2017). Maintainable Growth in Spanish Listed Corporates: A Planned Strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 24: 222–34. [Cross Ref]
  13. Cristina R. Gh. P. & Gheorghe N. P., (Oct-2019). A Fact-finding Analysis Basis a Questionnaire For Green and Maintainable Finance, CSR, and Outcome: Proof from the Romanian Commercial Surrounding. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. MDPI. doi:10.3390/jrfm12040162.
  14. Corporate Finance Institute (CFI), (2019). Capital: Anything that Increases One’s Ability to Generate Value. Available online: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/finance/capital/
  15. Caroline Flammer, (2020). Green Bonds: Implications and Effectiveness for Public Strategy. The University of Chicago Press Journals. Vol. 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/706794.
  16. de Souza Cunha, F. A., and C. P. Samanez, (2013). Outcome Examination of Maintainable Investments in the Brazilian Share Market: An Analysis for Corporate Maintainability Index (ISE). Journal of Business Ethics. 117: 19–36. [Cross Ref]
  17. Dikau, S. and Ryan-Collins, J., (Oct-2017). Green Central Banking in Emerging Market and Developing Country Economies. The New Economics Foundation.
  18. Nelling & E. Webb, (2009). CSR and economic outcome: the “virtuous circle” re-considered. Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting (Journal). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-008-0090-y.
  19. (2011). A Renewed EU Strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. European Commission. 2011. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Brussels, 25.10.2011; COM 681 Final. pp. 1–15.
  20. EIOPA, (2018). Insurance Stress Test report. European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg.
  21. Fowler, Stephen J., and Chris Hope, (2007). An Analytical Evaluation of Maintainable Commerce Indices and their Effect. Journal of Business Ethics. 76: 243–52. [Cross Ref]
  22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2014 & 2016.
  23. Gomez-Mejia, Haynes, Nunez-Nickel, Jacobson, & Moyano-Fuentes, (2007). Socioemotional wealth (SEW) perspective.
  24. Gallego-Alvarez, Isabel, Isabel M Garcia-Sanchez, and Cleber da Silva Vieira, (2014). Climate Change and Economic Outcome in Critical Period. Business Strategy and the Environment. 23: 361–74. [Cross Ref]
  25. Giese, Guido, and Linda-Eling Lee, (Apr-2019). Weighing the evidence: ESG and equity returns.Research Insight. MSCI ESG Research LLC.
  26. (2019). Global Sustainability Institute (GSI), Anglia Ruskin University. Available online: https://www.anglia.ac.uk/ global-sustainability-institute-gsi.
  27. Heller, W.P., (1999): “Equilibrium Market Formation Causes Missing Markets”, in: Chichilnisky, G.(ed.), Markets, Information and Uncertainty. Essays in Economic Theory in Honor of Kenneth J. Arrow, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 235–252.
  28. Hansen, Daniel, Patrick Houweling, and Jeroen Van Zundert, (2017). Momentum spillover from equities to credits. Journal of Banking & Finance. 79, pp. 28–41.
  29. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), (2008). The Natural Capital Approach: A Concept Paper. Winnipeg: IISD, pp. 1–85
  30. (2009). Innovation in social and institutional structures. OECD, p. 13
  31. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and United Nations (UN)., (2014). Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers. pp. 1–32.
  32. Juan C. Roboredo, (2018). Green bond and economic merchandise: Co-movement, differentiation and, rate spillover impacts. Elsevier. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.030.
  33. Jacob C., M. Umar, Phung A.T., Thao N.T., M.S. Sial & N.V. Khuong, (Feb-2019). Does CSR Impact the Economic Outcome of the Industrial Territory? Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Sustainability. MDPI. doi:10.3390/su11041182.
  34. Lopez, M. Victoria, Arminda Garcia, and Lazaro Rodriguez, (2007). Maintainable growth and corporate outcome: An analysis basis the Dow Jones Maintainability Indices. Journal of Business Ethics. 75: 285–300. [Cross Ref]
  35. Leaton, J., (2012). Unburnable carbon—Are the world’s financial markets carrying a carbon bub-ble. London: Carbon Tracker Initiative.
  36. Leaton J., (2013). Unburnable carbon: Wasted capital and stranded assets. Carbon Tracker Initiative & Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  37. la Torre, Oscar, Evaristo Galeana, and Dora Aguilasocho, (2016). The usefulness of the maintainable investment versus the broad market one. A first trial in the Mexican share market. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 22: 117–23. [Cross Ref]
  38. McGuire, Joseph William, (1963). Business and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  39. McWilliams, Siegel & Wright, (Jan-2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x.
  40. Michael Sampson, (2017). What lessons haven been learned from Basel-II, the ECB’s implementation of Basel-III in the Euro-area. Leiden university. International Relations and Organisations. Bachelor Thesis. Cassie Tingen.
  41. Mensi, Walid, Shawkat Hammoudeh, Idries Mohammad Wanas Al-Jarrah, Ahmet Sensoy, and Sang Hoon Kang, (2017). Active perils spillovers among oil prices, gold, and traditional, maintainability and Islamic equity accumulation and groups with portfolio inference. Energy Economics. 67: 454–75. [Cross Ref]
  42. Mittnik, S., Semmler, W. & Haider, A., (2019). Climate Disaster Risks –Empirics and a Multi-Phase Dynamic Model. IMF Working Paper 19/145.https://www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Publications/WP/2019/WPIEA2019145.ashx.
  43. Jain, G.D. Sharma & M. Srivastava, (Feb-2019). Can Maintainable Investment Deliver Better Economic Gains: A Relative analysis of ESG Index and MSCI Indices. Risks. MDPI. doi:10.3390/risks7010015.
  44. Maria M.M.Q., Jose M.L.Q. & Jesus R.H., (Mar-2019). ESG Outcome and Stakeholder’s Value Generation in the Banking Sector: Universal Variances. Sustainability. MDPI. doi:10.3390/su11051404.
  45. National Consumer Law Center (NCLC), (2019). Wealth Creation in Rural Communities: Discovering Eight Forms of Community Wealth. pp. 1–3.
  46. OECD, (2019b). OECD Insights: Human Capital: What Is Social Capital? pp. 1–4. Available online: https: //www.oecd.org/insights/37966934.pdf
  47. C. Kumar & G.P. Tsetsekos, (2007). Supervisory ownership and share value response to debt products downgrades. Applied Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/758534950.
  48. Park, Sung Yong, and Sang-Young Jei, (2010). Assumption and Hedging Efficiency of Time-Differentiating Hedge Ration: Adjustable Bivariate GARCH Tactics. Journal of Futures Markets. 30: 71–99. [Cross Ref]
  49. Patari, Satu, Ari Jantunen, Kalevi Kylaheiko, and Jaana Sandstrom, (2012). Does Sustainable Development Foster Value Creation? Empirical Evidence from the Global Energy Industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 19: 317–26. [Cross Ref]
  50. Dr. Rüdiger Hahn, (2013). ISO 26000, Policy Administration, CSR, Maintainability, Management Process, Orderliness. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1751.
  51. Pilar Marti, Carmen, Maria Rosa Rovira-Val, and Lisa Geneva Johanna Drescher, (2015). Are Companies that Subscribe to Maintainable Growth Better Economically? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 22: 305–19. [Cross Ref]
  52. Peter, Valentina & Tatiana, (2019). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. https://sociorepec.org/publication.xml?h=repec:pal:jintbs:v:50:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1057_s41267-018-01717.
  53. Roland, Ethan, and Gregory Landua, (2015). Regenerative Enterprise: Optimizing for Multi-capital Abundance. Lulu.com. pp. 1–59.
  54. Rajnoha, Rastislav, Petra Lesnikova, and Antonin Koraus, (2016). From Economic Outcomes to Planned Achievement Measurement Plan And Corporate Maintainability: Experimental Observation From Slovakia. Economics and Sociology. 9: 134–52. [Cross Ref] [PubMed]
  55. Rajnoha, Rastislav, Petra Lesnikova, and Vladimir Krajcik, (2017). Implication of Business Outcome Measurement Plans and Corporate Maintainability Notion to Total Business Outcome: “Protect the Earth And Maintain Your Accomplishment”. E and M Ekonomie And Management. 20: 111–28. [Cross Ref]
  56. Skare, Marinko, and Tea Golja, (2012). CSR and Company Financial Achievement—Is There Any Relationship? Ekonomska Istrazivanja-Economic Research. 25: 215–42. [Cross Ref]
  57. Young & V. Thyil, (2014). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: Role of context in international settings. Journal of Business Ethics. Springer.
  58. Chakrabarty & A.E. Bass, (2015). Comparing virtue, consequentialist, and deontological ethics-based corporate social responsibility: Mitigating microfinance risk in institutional voids. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 487-512.
  59. Santis, Paula, Andrei Albuquerque, and Fabiane Lizarelli, (2016). Do maintainable firms have a good economic outcome? An analysis of Brazilian public firms. Journal of Cleaner Production. 133: 735–45. [Cross Ref]
  60. Schmid, Jochen, Marieta Olaru, and Ana-Maria Verjel, (2017). The impact of maintainable investments on the financial motives of the firm concerning the overall standard practices. Amfiteatru Economic. 19: 939–50.
  61. Shelagh W., Joe T., Helena W. & Caroline O., (Dec-2018). Making finance consistent with climate goals. Insights for operationalizing Article 2.1c of the UNFCCC Paris Agreement. The work was licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.
  62. Samira D. & Sandra R., (Dec-2018). Environmental Reporting Practices: Are CAC 40 Firms Compliant with the Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures? www.anc.gouv.fr
  63. Simon Dikau & Ulrich Volz, (Sep-2018). Central Banking, Climate Change, and Green Finance. Asian Development Bank Institute. No. 867.
  64. Sang J.C., Chune Y.C. & Jason Y., (Jan-2019). Abstract on the Link between CSR and Economic Achievement. Sustainability. MDPI. doi:10.3390/su11020343.
  65. Sreevas S., Bindu A. & Mulesh S., (Published online Jun-2019). Ownership Structure and Corporate Social Responsibility in an Emerging Market. Springer. Asia Pacific Journal of Management (2020). 37:1165–1192 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09649-1.
  66. Schoenmaker, Dirk, (2019). Greening monetary policy. Bruegel Working paper 2/19. Brussels.
  67. Simon Thompson, (Oct-2020). Pathway to COP26: The Part of Green Finance. The Social Market Foundation in partnership with Chartered Banker, London.
  68. Tularam, Gurudeo Anand, Eduardo Roca, and Victor S H Wong, (2010). Analyzing of Socially Responsible Monetary Markets (SRI) Applying Active Conditional Correlation (DCC) Mode: Repercussions for Differentiation. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 6: 385–94. [Cross Ref]
  69. (2008). UN Interagency Planning Team for Avoidable Operation 2012; OECD.
  70. Ulrich Volz, (2016): Fostering Green Finance for Sustainable Development in Asia. Report Prepared for the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Asian Development Bank, Bonn: German Development Institute. https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/Fostering_Green_Finance_in_Asia_Volz.pd.
  71. Ulrich Volz, (Feb-2017). Art of a Maintainable Monetary Structure. The Part of Central Banks in Promoting Green Finance. The UN Environment Inquiry and The Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI). Inquiry WP 17/01.
  72. Ulrich Volz, (Mar-2018). Nurturing Green Finance for Maintainable Growth in Asia. Asian Development Bank Institute. No. 814.
  73. Vanetti, Renzo, (2007). Tavola rotonda: Etica, Reputazione e Competitivà—Competitività d’impresa e dimensione etica della tecnologia. Notizie di Politeia XXIII: 175–77. (In Italian).
  74. Voysey, A.and Abb, C., (2014): Stability and Sustainability in Banking Reform. Are environmental risks missing in Basel III?, Cambridge and Geneva: University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership and UNEP Finance Initiative.
  75. Mani & A. Gunasekaran, (Feb-2018). Four forces of supply chain social sustainability adoption in emerging economies. International Journal of Production Economics. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.015.
  76. World Bank, Sustainable Development Network, Global Facility for Disaster Reduction, and Recovery Unit, (2009). Economic Modeling of Income, Different Types of Capital and Natural Disasters. Policy Research Working Paper 4875. pp. 1–33.
  77. World Resources Forum, (2015). Natural Resources: Sustainable Targets, Technologies, Lifestyles and Governance. Villigen: Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), pp. 1–356.
  78. Su, M.W. Peng, W. Tan & Y-L Cheung, (2016). The Signaling Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Economies. J. Bus Ethics. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2404-4
  79. Zhou & Y. Cui, (Dec-2019). Green Bonds, Company Achievement, and CSR. Sustainability. MDPI. doi:10.3390/su11236881.

For Conference & Paper Publication​

UIJRT Publication - International Journal