UIJRT » United International Journal for Research & Technology

Physico-Chemical and Microbial Quality of Soft-White Cheese Made from Raw Milk with Different Somatic Counts

Total Views / Downloads: 31 

Cite ➜

Nieves, I.J.R., Oliveros, M.C.R. and Bautista, J.A.N., 2021. Physico-Chemical and Microbial Quality of Soft-White Cheese Made from Raw Milk with Different Somatic Counts. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 2(11), pp.80-86.


The study was conceptualized to assess the effect of somatic cell count on the quality of raw milk and soft-white cheese. Cow’s milk was classified into normal (T1), trace (T2) and positive 1 (T3) based on the direct microscopic somatic cell count (SCC). Soft-white cheese was subjected to quality changes; such as physio-chemical compositions: pH, titratable acidity, moisture content, total solids, protein and fat recovery; and total microbial count. Milk samples were subjected to quality analyses prior to cheese manufacture. All samples passed the alcohol precipitation and clot-on-boiling tests. Significant differences were observed in the pH, titratable acidity, moisture, protein, fat and total solids contents of cheese made from T1, T2 and T3 milk. Cheese from normal milk had the lowest titratable acidity from day 0 until day 11 indicating its good keeping quality. The high number of microbial counts even on the 0 days of storage has been observed in soft-white cheese made from the high number of somatic cells. The findings of the study indicate that milk with elevated SCC could compromise the typical sensory quality of the product and could pass the standard quality assessment; however, the quality of the resulting product would be inferior to normal milk. It is recommended that SCC determination be included in the quality assessment protocol on the farm.

Keywords: soft-white cheese, kesong puti, somatic cell count, cheese quality.


  1. AQUINO, E.M., TAPAY, N.E., and BARRAQUIO, V.L. A Case Study of the Indigenous Technology for making White Soft Cheese (Kesong Puti) in Lumban, Laguna, Philippines. 2011
  2. BANKS J.M., HORNE D.S. Chemistry of Gel Formation. Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, UK. Elsevier Science Ltd. 2003
  3. BARBANO D.M., RASMUSSEN R.R., LYNCH J.M. Influence of milk somatic cell count and milk age on cheese yield. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 369-388. 1991
  4. CONSIDINE, T., HEALY, A. L. KELLY, and P. L. H. MCSWEENEY. Hydrolysis of bovine caseins by cathepsin B, a cysteine proteinase indigenous to milk. Int. Dairy J. 14:117–124, 2004
  5. DALGLEISH, D.G. Measurement of electrophoretic mobilities and zeta-potentials of particles from milk using laser Doppler electrophoresis. Journal of Dairy Research. Volume 51, Issue 3, pp. 425-438, 1984
  6. DARLING D.F., DICKSON J., Electrophoretic mobility of casein micelles, J. Dairy Res. 46, 441-451. 1979
  7. DATTA, N., and H. C. DEETH. Age gelation of UHT milk—A review. Food Bioprod. Process. 79:197–210. 2001
  8. DE ROOS, A.L., WALSTRA, P. and GEURTS, T.J. The Association of Lysozyme with Casein. International Dairy Journal Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 319-324, 1998
  9. FAIRBAIRN, D. J., and B. A. LAW. Proteinases of psychrotrophic bacteria: Their production, properties, effects and control. J. Dairy Res. 53:139–177, 1986
  10. FAO. General Principles of Food Hygiene, Vol. 1, 4th revision of the 1969 edition, pp. 31–32, Codex Alimentarius of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nation, Rome. 2003
  11. GREEN, M. L., and CRUTCHFIELD, G. Density-gradient electrophoresis of native and of rennet-treated casein micelles. J. Dairy Res. 38, 151–164. 1971
  12. HARJANTI, D.W., CIPTANINGTYAS, R., WAHYONO, F., and SETIATIN, E.T. Isolation and identification of bacterial pathogen from mastitis milk in Central Java Indonesia. International Symposium on Food and Agro-biodiversity (ISFA). Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 102 – 012076 doi :10.1088/1755-1315/102/1/012076, 2018.
  13. ISMAIL, B., and S. S. NIELSEN. Invited review: Plasmin protease in milk: current knowledge and relevance to dairy industry. J. Dairy Sci. 93:4999–5009. 2010
  14. JUNEJA, V K and EBLEN, B S. Predictive thermal inactivation model for Listeria monocytogenes with temperature, pH, NaCl and sodium pyrophosphate as controlling factors. Journal ofFood Protection; 62:986-993. 1999
  15. KITCHEN, B.J. Review of the progress of dairy science – bovine mastitis – milk compositional changes and related diagnostic-tests. Journal of Dairy Research, 48(1): 167–188. 1981
  16. KLEI L., YUN J., SAPRU A., LYNCH J., BARBANO D., SEARS P., GALTON D., Effects of milk somaticcellcounton cottage cheese yield and quality. J. Dairy Sci. 81, 1205-1213. 1981
  17. LESLIE, K.E., JANSEN, J.T, LIM, G.H. Opportunities and implications for improved on-farm cowside diagnostics. Proc DeLaval Hygiene Symp:147–160, 2002
  18. MAZAL, G., VIANNA, P. C. B., SANTOS, M. V. and GIGANTE, M. L. Effect of Somatic Cell Count on Prato Cheese Composition. J. Dairy Sci. 90:630–636, 2007
  19. MOTTAR, J. F. Effect on the quality of dairy products. p281–292 in Enzymes of Psychrotrophs in Raw Food. R. C. McLellar, ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 1989
  20. MURPHY, S. C., MARTIN, N. H., BARBANO, D. M., and WIEDMANN, M. Influence of raw milk quality on processed dairy products: How do raw milk quality test results relate to product quality and yield?. J Dairy Sci.,99(12):10128-10149. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11172. 2016
  22. O’BRIEN, B., W. J. MEANEY, D. MCDONAGH, and A. KELLY. Influence of somatic cell count interval on composition and processing characteristics of milk from cows in late lactation. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 56:213–218. 2001
  23. POLITIS, I., and NG-KWAI-HANG. K.F. Association between somatic cell count of milk and cheese-yielding capacity. J. Dairy Sci. 71:1720–1727. 1988
  24. POLITIS, I., and NG-KWAI-HANG, K.F. Effects of somatic cell count and milk composition on cheese composition and cheese making efficiency. J. Dairy Sci. 71:1711. 1988
  25. REYHER, K.K., DOHOO, I.R, SCHOLL, D.T, KEEFE, G.P. Evaluation of minor pathogen intramammary infection, susceptibility parameters, and somatic cell counts on the development of new intramammary infections with major mastitis pathogens. J Dairy Sci. 95(7):3766-80 doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5148. 2012
  26. RUEGG, P.I. California Mastitis Test (CMT) Fact Sheet 1. 2005
  27. SENHAJI, A. F. The protective effect of fat on the heat resistance of bacteria (II). International Journal of Food Science and technology. Volume12, Issue3, p217-230. 1977
  28. SHARMA, N., SINGH, N.K. and BHADWAL, M.S.  Relationship of Somatic Cell Count and Mastitis: An Overview. Asian-Aust. J. Animal Science Vol. 24, No. 3: 429 – 438, 2011
  29. SPRONG, R.C., HULSTEIN, M.F., VAN DER MEER, R. High intake of milk fat inhibits intestinal colonization of Listeria but not of Salmonella in rats. Journal of Nutrition 129,1382-1389. 1999
  30. SØRHAUG, T., AND L. STEPANIAK. Psychrotrophs and their enzymes in milk and dairy products: Quality aspects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 8:35–41, 1997
  31. TÖPEL, A. Chemie und physik der milch. Behr’s Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg DE, 756, pp. 369-434. 2004
  32. VÁZQUEZ, H.C., JÄGER, S., WOLTER, W., ZSCHÖCK, M., VAZQUEZ, M.A.C., EL-SAYED, A. Isolation and identification of main mastitis pathogens in Mexico. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec., v.65, n.2, p.377-382, 2013
  33. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Sixty-eight World Health Assembly, 2015

For Conference & Paper Publication​

UIJRT Publication - International Journal