UIJRT » United International Journal for Research & Technology

Determinants of Indonesian E-Grocery Shopping Behavior After Covid-19 Pandemic Using the Technology Acceptance Model Approach

Total Views / Downloads: 576 

Cite ➜

Kurniasari, F. and Riyadi, W.T., 2021. Determinants of Indonesian E-Grocery Shopping Behavior After Covid-19 Pandemic Using the Technology Acceptance Model Approach. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 3(1), pp.12-18.

Abstract

The increasing number of e-grocery start-ups and COVID19 pandemic have accelerated the growth of e-grocery services in Indonesia. In fact, e-grocery adoption is low compared with other e-commerce product categories such as fashion and electronics. Customers are considering some factors including trust, risk, benefit (usefulness) and the level of ease of use before making a decision to shop online grocery. The objective of this study is to determine whether all these factors affect trust and finally the adoption in shopping for grocery products online and whether the Indonesian consumers will return to shopping for grocery products offline after the COVID19 pandemic. This research provided a new perspective by integrating Technology Acceptance Model Approach with trust as the intervening variable. Quantitative research was conducted by distributing questionnaires among the 195 respondents who had used e-grocery/shopping services. All data collection was analyzed using PLS-SEM (Partial Least Square – Structural Equation Model). The results of this study indicate that perceived risks, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use have a positive effect on trust. The study proved that trust had a significant effect in the adoption of e-grocery platforms among Indonesian shoppers. The e-grocery platform should offer innovative and consistent products or services to keep their customers buying groceries online even after the COVID-19 pandemic is over especially for the older generation who are more enjoyed buying at the conventional markets.

Keywords: Technology Acceptance Model, Perceived Risk, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness; Trust, E-grocery Adoption.

References

  1. Google, & TEMASEK, “e-Conomy SEA 2020: Southeast Asia’s internet economy hits an inflection point,” In Google TEMASEK. blog.google.com, 2020.
  2. Central Bureau of Statistics, “Statistik E-Commerce 2019,” 2019. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2019/12/18/fd1e96b05342e479a83917c6/statistik-ecommerce-2019.html
  3. Snapcart, “How big is your brand’s opportunity in online grocery platforms?,” 2020. https://snapcart.global/how-big-is-your-brands-opportunity-in-online-grocery-platforms/
  4. L.E.K Consulting, “Covid-19 a catalyst for growth in Indonesia’s e-grocery market,” 2021. https://www.consultancy.asia/news/3941/covid-19-a-catalyst-for-growth-in-indonesias-e-grocery-market
  5. Stern, N., “E-Commerce and Grocery: This Time It’s Real. Forbes.Com,” 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilstern/2020/04/27/e-commerce-and-grocery-this-time-its-real/?sh=648e14c25d65
  6. Febransyah, A., & Camelia Goni, J. I., “Measuring the supply chain competitiveness of e-commerce industry in Indonesia,” Competitiveness Review, 2020
  7. Marketeers, “Menanti Pertumbuhan Belanja Pangan Online di Indonesia,” 2018. https://marketeers.com/menanti-pertumbuhan-belanja-pangan-online-di-indonesia/
  8. Jagani, K., Oza, F. V., & Chauhan, H., “Customer Segmentation and Factors Affecting Willingness to Order Private Label Brands: An E-Grocery Shopper’s Perspective,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0257-0.ch011
  9. Aylott, R & Mitchell, V-W, “An exploratory study of grocery shopping stressors”, British Food Journal, 101(9):683-700. October 1999. DOI: 10.1108/00070709910288883
  10. Venkatesh, V.; Bala, H., “Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions, ” Decision Sciences, Vol. 39 (2), pp. 273–315, 2009.
  11. Lee, C.-Y., Tsao, C.-H., & Chang, W.-C., “The Relationship between Attitude toward Using and Customer Satisfaction with Mobile Application Services,” Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(5), pp. 680-697, 2015.
  12. Egbunike, F.C., Emudainohwo, O.B., Gunardi, A., Kurniasari, F., Prihanto, J.J.N., “Sustainability Accounting Practices and Disclosure by Multinational Corporation in Nigeria,” Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Vol. XIII, Summer, 3(57), pp. 751-759., 2018.
  13. Driediger, F., & Bhatiasevi, V., “Online grocery shopping in Thailand: Consumer acceptance and usage behavior,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 48, 224–237, 2019.
  14. Lim, N, “Consumers’ perceived risk: sources versus consequences,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. Vol. 2(3), pp. 216-228, 2003.
  15. Mwiya, B., Chikumbi, F., Shikaputo, C., Kabala, E., Kaulung’ombe, B., & Siachinji, B., “Examining Factors Influencing E-Banking Adoption: Evidence from Bank Customers in Zambia,” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 741-759, 2017.
  16. Liebana-Cabanillas, F., Higueras-Castillo, E., Molinillo, S., & Montanez, M. R., “Assesing The Role of Risk and Trust in Customers’ Adoption of Online Payment System, ” International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies, 99-113, 2018.
  17. Shipps, B., & Phillips, B., “Social Networks, Interactivity and Satisfaction: Assessing Socio-Technical Behavioral Factors as an Extension to Technology Acceptance, ” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 35-52, 2013.
  18. Atkins, K. G., Kumar, A., & Kim, Y. K., “Smart grocery shopper segment, ”Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 42–53, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2015.1082080.
  19. Mou, J., Shin, D. H., & Cohen, J., “ Understanding trust and perceived usefulness in the consumer acceptance of an e-service: a longitudinal investigation,” Behaviour and Information Technology, 36(2), 125–139, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1203024
  20. Ma, L., “Understanding non-adopters’ intention to use internet pharmacy: Revisiting the roles of trustworthiness, perceived risk and consumer traits,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management – JET-M, 59, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101613
  21. Wu, W. Y., & Ke, C. C., “An online shopping behavior model integrating personality traits, perceived risk, and technology acceptance, ” Social Behavior and Personality, 43(1), 85–98, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.1.85
  22. Yang, Q., Pang, C., Liu, L., Yen, D. C., & Michael Tarn, J., “Exploring consumer perceived risk and trust for online payments: An empirical study in China’s younger generation,” Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 9–24., 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2015.03.058
  23. Chen, D., & Han, C., “A Comparative Study of Online P2P Lending in the USA and China,” The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce. 17 (2), 12-15, 2012.
  24. Eisingerich, A.B., & Bell, S.J., “Perceived Service Quality and Customer Trust Does Enhancing Customers’ Service Knowledge Matter?” Journal of Service Research, 10(3), 256-368, 2008.
  25. Singh, N., & Sinha, N., “How perceived trust mediates merchant’s intention to use a mobile wallet technology,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52(June 2019), 101894, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101894
  26. Ventre, I., & Kolbe, D., “The Impact of Perceived Usefulness of Online Reviews, Trust and Perceived Risk on Online Purchase Intention in Emerging Markets: A Mexican Perspective,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 32(4), 287–299, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2020.1712293
  27. Pavlou, P. A., “Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
  28. Cooper, D.R., & Schindler, P. S., “Business Research Methods,” 10th ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 2014.
  29. Nunnaly, J, “Psychometric Theory,” pp. 64-65, 1978.
  30. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M.,” A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM),” (Second Edi). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  31. Dhagarra, D., Goswami, M., & Kumar, G., “Impact of Trust and Privacy Concerns on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: An Indian Perspective,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, 141, 104164, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104164
  32. Malhotra, “Marketing Research (4th ed.),” SAGE Publication. pp. 76-78, 2012.
  33. Meng, F., “What Determinants of Lending Decision for Chinese Peer-to-Peer Lenders? Profile of Finance Management,” University of Twente, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, 2016.
  34. Walchek, S., “The unbundling of finance,” Tech-Crunch. pp.3-9, 2015.
  35. Khosravi and Hussin: A Review of Customer Knowledge Management Importance, “Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Support Systems,” Vol.1 (1), pp. 45-52, 2014.
  36. Chen, D., Lai, F., & Lin, Z., “A trust Model for Online Peer-to-Peer Lending: A Lender’s Perspective,” Information Technology Management, 5(4), 239-254, 2014.
  37. Park, J., Amendah, E., Lee, Y., & Hyun, H., “M-payment service: Interplay of perceived risk, benefit, and trust in service adoption,” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 29(1), pp 31–43, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20750

For Conference & Paper Publication​

UIJRT Publication - International Journal