UIJRT » United International Journal for Research & Technology

Level of Implementation of Spiral Progression Approach in Relation to Students’ Performance in Algebra

Chariss O. Rico, and Genelyn R. Baluyos

Total Views / Downloads: 87 

Cite ➜

Rico, C.O. and Baluyos, G.R., 2021. Level of Implementation of Spiral Progression Approach in Relation to Students’ Performance in Algebra. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 2(11), pp.01-08.

Abstract

In the K to 12 curriculum, teachers are required to teach using the Spiral Progression Approach. This study explored the level of implementation of the Spiral Progression Approach in relation to performance in Algebra of students in Tangub City National High School. The descriptive-correlational design was used in the study. Adapted and modified Spiral Progression Approach in Mathematics Questionnaire (L &Alegre, 2019) and the researcher-made Algebra Summative Test was used in gathering the data. The respondents of the study were 249 Grade 10 students selected through simple random sampling. Mean, Standard Deviation, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient, and Regression Analysis were used as the statistical tools. Results revealed that the teachers highly implemented the Spiral Progression Approach, but the students’ performance in Algebra was very poor. The use of a Spiral Progression Approach in teaching was significantly related to the students’ performance in Algebra. Discussion is a common strategy for teachers in teaching the Spiral Progression Approach. Future researchers conduct researches focusing on the factors that affect students’ academic performance in Mathematics.

Keywords: Algebra, discussion, implementation, performance, Spiral Progression Approach.

References

  1. Angeles, J. (2013). Rational kinematics (Vol. 34). Springer Science & Business Media.
  2. Boston, M. D., & Wilhelm, A. G. (2017). Middle school mathematics instruction in instructionally focused urban districts. Urban Education, 52(7), 829-861. Retrieved on December 18, 2019 from https://bit.ly/2MI5fmY
  3. Brahier, D. J. (2016). Teaching secondary and middle school mathematics. Routledge.Retrieved on December 18, 2019 from https://bit.ly/37c9aBP
  4. Corpuz, B. B. (2014). The Spiral Progression Approach in the K to 12 curriculum. Retrieved on January, 21, 2017 fromhttps://bit.ly/30o2aQM
  5. Duncombe, J & Jessop, J (2002). “Doing Rapport” and the Ethics of “Faking Friendship”, Ch.6: 107-122 in Mauthner et al.
  6. Eichler, A., & Erens, R. (2015). Domain-specific belief systems of secondary mathematic teachers. In From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education (pp. 179-200). Springer, Cham. Retrieved on December 18, 2019 from https://bit.ly/3f5gfqx
  7. Evans, W. R., & Selen, M. A. (2017). Investigating the use of mastery-style online homework exercises in introductory Algebra-based mechanics in a controlled clinical study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020119.  Retrived on February 26, 2020 from https://bit.ly/2UlZYFx
  8. Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 100692.  Retrieved on February 20, 2020 from https://bit.ly/3h4geoJ
  9. Garzón, J., & Bautista, J. (2018). Virtual Algebra Tiles: A pedagogical tool to teach and learn Algebra through geometry. Journal of computer assisted learning, 34(6), 876-883. Retrieved on February 19, 2020 from https://bit.ly/30oyIKn
  10. Haciomeroglu, G. (2017). Reciprocal Relationships between Mathematics Anxiety and Attitude towards Mathematics in Elementary Students.ActaDidactica Napocensia, 10(3), 59-68. Retrieved on February 26, 2020 from eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1160567
  11. Hattikudur, S., Sidney, P. G., &Alibali, M. W. (2016). Does comparing informal and formal procedures promote mathematics learning? The benefits of bridging depend on attitudes toward mathematics. The Journal of Problem-solving, 9(1), 2. Retrieved on December 25, 2017 from https://tinyurl.com/y6wmy532
  12. Kini, T. & Podolsky A. (2016). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A Review of the Research. Retrieved on April 1, 2019 at https://bit.ly/3f5VE5u
  13. Latif, R. M. (2016). PROBLEM-SOLVING EFFECTS IN TEACHING AND LEARNING MATHEMATICS. International Journal of Innovation and       Applied Studies, 18(3), 909-927. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2AOxT2U
  14. Lauermann, F., Meißner, A., & Steinmayr, R. (2019). Relative importance of intelligence and ability self-concept in predicting test performance and school grades in the math and language arts domains. Journal of Educational Psychology. Retrieved on February 25, 2020 fromhttps://bit.ly/3cL2fR5
  15. Lee, K., Ng, S. F., & Bull, R. (2017). Learning and solving more complex problems: The roles of working memory, updating, and prior skills for general mathematical achievement and algebra. In Acquisition of complex arithmetic skills and higher-order mathematics concepts (pp. 197-220). Academic Press. Retrieved on February 20, 2020 fromhttps://bit.ly/2BObhAb
  16. Mahanta, D. (2014). Impact of Attitude and Self-Concept of the Students towards Mathematics upon their achievement in Mathematics.International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 6(1), 20. Retrieved on January 1, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/yauuqt9p
  17. Mantiza, Mary Blaise (2013) Spiral Progression in Science. https://www.slideshare.net/BESPF1/spiral-progression-in-science
  18. Maz-Machado, A., León-Mantero, C., Casas, J. C., & Renaudo, J. A. (2015). Attitude towards mathematics of computer engineering students. Retrieved on January 1, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/y8tajmep
  19. Meadows, B. A. (2016). Self-Paced Mastery Learning in High School Algebra and Geometry Classrooms: Stakeholders’ Perceptions and Experiences (Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University). Retrieved on February 26, 2020 from https://bit.ly/2YhN9NM
  20. Merza, L. L., Orge, N. B., Agatep, J. L., & Edaño, D. (2018). Factors affecting the implementation of Spiral Progression Approach in relation to Students’ Academic Performance in Mathematics. Retrieved on December 9, 2019 from www.researchpublish.com
  21. Moss, D., & Lamberg, T. (2019). Conceptions of expressions and equations in early algebra: A learning trajectory. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 20(2), 170-192. Retrieved on February 20, 2020 from http://www.cimt.org.uk/ijmtl/index.php/IJMTL/article/view/157
  22. Murphy, J., Chang, J. M., & Suaray, K. (2016). Student performance and attitudes in a collaborative and flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(5), 653-673. Retrieved on February 26, 2020 from https://bit.ly/2YgFi2V.
  23. O’Connell, K. A., Wostl, E., Crosslin, M., Berry, T. L., & Grover, J. P. (2018). Student ability best predicts final grade in a college Algebra course. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(3), 167-181. Retrieved on February 25, 2020 from https://bit.ly/30tXcls
  24. Olsen, J. K., & Finkelstein, S. (2017). Through the (thin-slice) looking glass: An initial look at rapport and co-construction within peer collaboration. Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved on December 18, 2019 from https://repository.isls.org/handle/1/272
  25. Orale, R. L., & Uy, M. E. A. (2018). When the Spiral is Broken: Problem Analysis in the Implementation of Spiral Progression Approach in Teaching Mathematics. Journal of Academic Research, 3(3), 14-24. Retrieved on February 19, 2020 from http://jar.ssu.edu.ph/index.php/JAR/article/view/8
  26. Orbe, J. R., Espinosa, A. A., & Datukan, J. T. (2018). Teaching chemistry in a spiral progression approach: Lessons from science teachers in the Philippines. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 43(4), 17. Retrieved on December 9, 2019 from https://bit.ly/30ozjM7
  27. Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Psychology Press. Retrieved on February 11, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/y7e673yh
  28. Quijano, Yolanda S. & Technical Working Group on Curriculum (2012). Orientation for K  to 12 Division Coordinators. DepED Complex.
  29. Sanders, S. (2016). Critical and creative thinkers in mathematics classrooms. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 6(1), 19-27. Retrieved on December 18, 2019 from https://ro.uow.edu.au/jseem/vol6/iss1/4/
  30. Saqr, M., Fors, U., & Tedre, M. (2018). How the study of online collaborative learning can guide teachers and predict students’ performance in a medical course? BMC medical education, 18(1), 24. Retrieved on February 20, 2020 from https://bit.ly/2XLrhLW
  31. Simsek, E., Xenidou-Dervou, I., Karadeniz, I., & Jones, I. (2019). The conception of substitution of the equals sign plays a unique role in students’ Algebra performance. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 5(1), 24-37. Retrieved on February          25, 2020 from https://jnc.psychopen.eu/article/view/147
  32. Takeuchi, M. A., Bryan, V., Valera, S., & Dadkhahfard, S. (2019). Immigrant Students’ Stories About Learning Mathematics in Groups. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 19(3), 237-253. Retrieved on December 18, 2019 from https://bit.ly/2MD53Fs
  33. Wafubwa, R. N. (2015). Influence of Strengthening Mathematics and Science in Secondary Education (SMASSE) in Service Education and Training (INSET) on the Attitude of Students towards Mathematics Performance in Public Secondary Schools of Rangwe Division, Homa-Bay Sub County-Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(26), 57-61. Retrieved on January 1, 2018 from https://tinyurl.com/y9n9k84m
  34. Wilder, S., & Berry, L. (2016). Emporium Model: The Key to Content Retention in Secondary Math Courses. Journal of Educators Online, 13(2), 53-75. Retrieved on February 19, 2020 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1106734

For Conference & Paper Publication​

UIJRT Publication - International Journal