UIJRT » United International Journal for Research & Technology

Learners’ Engagement and Achievement Through Localized Whole Brain Teaching Strategy

Total Views / Downloads: 308 

Cite ➜

Reyes, J.R.V. and Tamban, V.E., 2021. Learners’ Engagement and Achievement Through Localized Whole Brain Teaching Strategy. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 3(1), pp.106-117.


The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the Whole Brain Teaching Strategy in improving the classroom engagement and achievement of learners in Mathematics 7. This used a quasi-experimental research design in which the groups answered pre-survey and post-survey, pre-test and post-test, and included formative tests in between. The comparison group was taught using the conventional teaching method while the experimental group was taught using the WBT strategy. They had the same level of engagement and achievement before the study was conducted. There was a significant improvement in comparisons’ cognitive engagement while the experimental group improved in all dimensions of classroom engagement after the execution of the two teaching methods. They differed significantly in terms of cognitive classroom engagement with medium effect size. Meanwhile, the two groups showed significant improvements in achievement in Mathematics 7. However, there was no significant difference in their level of achievement as reflected in most of their formative tests and the post-test. Moreover, both strategies produced a significant relationship between engagement and achievement in which the behavioural engagement of the experimental group had a moderate positive correlation to achievement. These imply that the Whole Brain Teaching Strategy is more effective in enhancing classroom engagement but as just as effective in increasing learners’ achievement in Mathematics compared to the conventional method.

Keywords: achievement, engagement, mathematics, whole brain teaching strategy.


  1. Alford, D. (2014). What is whole brain teaching in the classroom. Walsh University Retrieved from http:/www.walsh.edu/whole-brain-teaching.
  2. Andaya,Olive Joy F. (2014). Factors That Affect Mathematics Achievements of Students of Philippine
  3. Bawaneh, A. K. A., Md Zain, A. N & Saleh, S. (2011). The Effect of Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method on Students’ Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits. European Journal of Physics Education, 2(2).
  4. Biffle, C. (2013). Whole Brain Teaching for Challenging Kids (and the rest of your class, too!). Yucaipa, CA: Whole Brain Teaching LLC.
  5. Boer, A., Steyn, T., &Toit, P.H. (2001). A whole brain approach to teaching and learning in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 15(3), 185-93.
  6. Calderon, M. T. F. (2014). A Critique of K-12 Philippine Education System
  7. Coyne, M. D., Kame’enui, E. J., &Carnine, D. W. (2007), Effective teaching strategies that accommodatediverse learners. India: Prentice Hall
  8. Duman, B. (2006). The effect of brain-based instruction to improve on students‟ academic achievement in social studies instruction. Retrieved from http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2006/papers/3380.pdf.
  9. Duman, B. (2010). The effects of brain-based learning on the academic achievement of students with different learning styles. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ919873.pdf
  10. Fernandez, A. F. (2013). Standards-Based Assessment: DepEd’s Perspective. NETRC, DepEd. Retrieved July 7, 2018 from http://ceap.org.ph/upload/download/20136/31131995_1.pdf
  11. Hakim, L., Cahya, E., Nurlaelah, E., & Lestari, Z. (2015). The Application EQ and SQ in Learning Mathematics with Brain-Based Learning Approach to Improve Students’ Mathematical Connection and Self-Efficacy in Senior High School. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 542-557.
  12. Hart, S. R., Stewart, K., Jimerson, S. R. (2011). The Student Engagement in Schools Questionnaire (SESQ) and the Teacher Engagement Report Form-New (TERF-N): Examining the Preliminary Evidence
  13. Herrmann-Nehdi, A. (2002). Training with The Brain in Mind: The Application of brain dominance technology to teaching and learning. Session Number 509.
  14. Herrmann-Nehdi, A. (2009). The Best of Both Worlds-Making Blended Learning Really Work by Engaging the Whole Brain®. Lake Laurie, NC: Herrmann International.
  15. Ganuc, S. (2014). The Relationship Between Student Engagement and Their Academic Achievement, YuzuncuYil University
  16. Ghazvini, S. D. (2011). Relationships between Academic Self-concept and Academic Performance in High School Students. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1034-1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.235
  17. Inocian, R. B. (2015). Integrated Arts-based Teaching (IAT) Model for Brain-based Learning. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v4n2p130
  18. , Neacsu, I., Safta, C.G., &Sudita, M. (2011), The study of the realtion between the teaching methods and the learning styles-The impact upon teh students‟ academic conduct. Procedia:Social and behavioural sciences, 256-260
  19. Jensen, E. (2005). Brain-based learning. Pearson Education, Inc., Indian Branch, 482 F.I.E. Patparganj, Delhi. 15.
  20. Jensen, E. (2009). Teaching with poverty in mind: What being poor does to kids‟ brains and what schools can do about it. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  21. Klinek, S. R. (2009). Brain-based learning: Knowledge, beliefs, and practices of college of education faculty in the Pennsylvania state system of higher education. (doctoral Dissertation), Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
  22. Lee, J.S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807491
  23. Lockhart, E. (2016). English as a Foreign Language through Whole Brain Teaching in Primary School (Doctoral dissertation, RoviraiVirgili University).
  24. McGuckin, D., &Ladhani, M. (2010). The Brains behind Brain-Based Research: The Tale of Two Postsecondary Online Learners. College Quarterly, 13(3), 6-7.
  25. Michael, I. (2015). Factors Leading to Poor Performance in Mathematics Subject in Kibaha Secondary Schools, University of Tazania
  26. Mojares, Juvy G. (2016). Teaching Strategies in English: The Case of Batangas State University – Malvar, Philippines
  27. Muthukrishnan , P., Phang, A., Rui, Y. & Ling, L. B. (2019). Early Childhood Learners: Effectiveness of Whole Brain Teaching in Mathematics Classroom Engaging
  28. Noddings, N. (2007). Philosophy of education. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
  29. Noureen, G., Awan, R. N., & Fatima, H. (2013). Effect of Brain-based Learning on Academic Achievement of VII Graders in Mathematics
  30. Olibie, E. (2013). Emergent Global Curriculum Trends: Implications for Teachers as Facilitators of Curriculum Change
  31. Rehman, Malik, M. A., Hussain, S., Iqbal, Z., & Rauf, M. (2012). Effectiveness of Brain- Based Learning Theory on Secondary Level Students of Urban Areas. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 6(1), 113-122.
  32. Risley, R. (2009). Book Review: How the Brain Learns Mathematics, David A. Sousa. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 97-100.
  33. Richardson, J. J. (2011). Increasing Left and Right Brain Communication to Improve Learning for Tenth Grade Students in a Public School (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (UMI No. 3468506)
  34. Sontillano, R. (2018). Impact of Whole Brain Teaching Based Instruction On Academic Performance of Grade 8 Students in Algebra: Compendium of WBT-Based Lesson Plans
  35. Skinner, E.A., Kindermann, T.A. &Furrer, C.J. (2009). A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection: Conceptualization and Assessment of Children’s Behavioral and Emotional Participation in Academic Activities in the Classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525.
  36. Sterns, C. H. W. (2016). Effect of whole brain teaching on student self-concept. Walden University Scholar Works.
  37. Tufekci, S., &Demirel, M. (2009). “The effect of brain based learning on achievement, retention, attitude and learning process.” Elsevier publication. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 1782-1791.
  38. Winters, C. A. (2001). Brain based teaching: Fad or promising teaching method. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED455218.pdf.

For Conference & Paper Publication​

UIJRT Publication - International Journal