UIJRT » United International Journal for Research & Technology

The Construct of Comfort: A Case Study of Environmental Comfort of University Classrooms

Total Views / Downloads: 97 

Cite ➜

Bakare, S.Y. and Alibaba, H.Z., 2020. The Construct of Comfort: A Case Study of Environmental Comfort of University Classrooms. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 1(6), pp.19-23.

Abstract

A large number of students spend more time at school than they do at home. This indicates the need to have comfortable spaces in educational buildings. The quality of an Indoor environment is directly related to students’ productivity and well-being, but recent researches mainly focus on the effects of single parameters on human comfort, without examining the other variables, such as thermal, acoustic, and visual. This paper studies the indoor comfort level of university classroms. The objective of this research is investigate the quality of the school environment in relation to comfort by analyzing all the factors (thermal, acoustic, lighting, air quality) which affects the users’ wellbeing. Researches have shown that the thermal, acoustical, visual quality in classrooms plays a significant role to students’ behaviour and performance. In order to optimize the students’ performance in clasrooms, all these variables need to be fully studied and considered. Past literature reviews studying the issue of indoor environmental quality and its comfort, mainly focused on the effects of a single factor. For instance, reviews have been conducted to study the conditions that lead to occupants’ satisfaction with the thermal environment or with the acoustic environment. There has been little or no review conducted to summarize the possible effects of different factors, thermal, visual and acoustic conditions as well as indoor air quality on indoor environmental quality. The present literature review was performed to gather more information on this matter. Therefore, this paper focuses on thermal, acoustic, lighting comfort, as significant factors that may have an effect on the students’ performance, with regards to attention, comprehension and learning levels.

Keywords: Thermal comfort, Acoustic, Lighting, University Classrooms, Construct, Air Quality, Indoor Environmental Quality.

References

  1. Nyuk Hien Wong, Shan Shan Khoo, 2003, Thermal comfort in classrooms in the tropics, Energy and Buildings 35, pp.337-35.
  2. ASHRAE 55 (2004): Thermal environment conditions for human occupancy, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  3. Fanger, P.O. Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Application in Environmental Engineering; Danish. Technical Press: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1970.
  4. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). Ergonomics of the Thermal
  5. Environment—Assessment of the Influence of the Thermal Environment Using Subjective
  6. Judgement Scales; International Standard EN ISO 10551:2001; ISO: Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
  7. Krüger E. Estimation of relative humidity for thermal comfort assessment. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International IBPSA Conference Building Simulation. Vol. 2. 2001. p. 765–72.
  8. Sala, V. Viljanen Improvement of acoustic conditions for speech communication in classrooms Appl Acoust, 45 (1995), pp. 81-91
  9. Hodgson, Case-study evaluations of the acoustical designs of renovated university classrooms Appl Acoust, 65 (2004), pp. 69-89
  10. L. Krüger, P.H.T. Zannin Acoustic, thermal and luminous comfort in classrooms Build Environ, 39 (2004), pp. 1055-1063
  11. M. Kennedy, M. Hodgson, L.D. Edgett, et al. Subjective assessment of listening environments in university classrooms: perceptions of students Acoust Soc Am, 119 (1) (2006), pp. 299-309
  12. Astolfi, F. Pellerey Subjective and objective assessment of acoustical and overall environmental quality in secondary school classrooms Acoust Soc Am, 123 (1) (2008), pp. 163-173
  13. American National Standard. ANSI S12.60: acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools. Melville; 2002.
  14. C. Lee, K.W. Mui, L.T. Wong, W.Y. Chan, E.W.M. Lee, C.T. Cheung
  15. Student learning performance and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and air conditioned university teaching rooms Build. Environ., 49 (2012), pp. 238-244
  16. S. Zomorodian, M. Tahsildoost, M. Hafezi, Thermal comfort in educational buildings: a review article, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 59 (2016), pp. 895-906
  17. Buratti, P. Ricciardi Adaptive analysis of thermal comfort in university classrooms: correlation between experimental data and mathematical models Build. Environ., 44 (2009), pp. 674-687
  18. R. Hodgson, Experimental investigation of the acoustical characteristics of university classrooms J. Acoust Soc Am., 106 (1999), pp. 1810-1819
  19. Michael, C. Heracleous, Assesment of natural lighting performance and visual comfort of educational architecture in Southern Europe. The case of education schools premises in Cyprus
  20. Energy Build., 140 (2017), pp. 443-457
  21. Winterbottom, A. Wilkins, Lighting and discomfort in the classroom J. Environ. Psycology, 29 (2009), pp. 63-75
  22. Frontczak, Wargocki Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments Build. Environ., 46 (2011), pp. 922-937
  23. M. Kennedy, M. Hodgson
  24. Subjective assessment of listening environments in university classrooms: perceptions of students J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 119 (1) (2006), pp. 299-309
  25. P.H. Zannin, C.R. Marcon Objective and subjective evaluation of the acoustic comfort in classrooms Appl. Ergon., 38 (2006), pp. 675-680
  26. ISO 7726 Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment – Instruments for Measuring Physical (1998)
  27. UNI EN ISO 10551 Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment – Evaluation of the Influence of the Thermal Environment through Subjective Judgement Scales (2002)
  28. Paola Ricciardi; Cinzia Buratti, Environmental quality of university classrooms: Subjective and objective evaluation of the thermal, acoustic, and lighting comfort conditions, Elsevier BV (2018)
  29. Dias Pereira, D. Raimondo, S.P. Corgnati, M.G. da Silva
  30. Energy consumption in schools influence student consumption in schools – a review paper
  31. Sustain. Energy Rev., 40 (2014), pp. 911-922
  32. Haverinen-Shaughnessy, R.J. Shaughnessy, E.C. Cole, O. Toyinbo, D.J. Moschandreas
  33. An assessment of indoor environmental quality in schools and its association with health and performance Build. Environ., 93 (2015), pp. 35-40
  34. C. Lee, K.W. Mui, L.T. Wong, W.Y. Chan, E.W.M. Lee, C.T. Cheung
  35. Student learning performance and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and air conditioned university teaching rooms Build. Environ., 49 (2012), pp. 238-244
  36. Yang, B. Becerik-Gerber, L. Mino, A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance Build. Environ., 70 (2013), pp. 171-188
  37. Winterbottom, A. Wilkins, Lighting and discomfort in the classroom, J. Environ. Psychol., 29 (2009), pp. 63-75
  38. M. Kennedy, M. Hodgson, L.D. Edgett, N. Lamb, R. Rempel Subjective assessment of listening environments in university classrooms: perception of students J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 119 (2006), pp. 299-309
  39. H.T. Zannin, C.R. Marcon, Objective and subjective evaluation of the acoustic comfort in classrooms Appl. Ergon., 38 (2007), pp. 675-680
  40. Zomorodian, Z. S., Tahsildoost, M., & Hafezi, M. (2016). Thermal comfort in educational buildings: A review article. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 895–906.
  41. Corgnati, S. P., Filippi, M., & Viazzo, S. (2007). Perception of the thermal environment in high school and university classrooms: Subjective preferences and thermal comfort. Building and Environment, 42(2), 951–959.
  42. Buratti, C., Belloni, E., Merli, F., & Ricciardi, P. (2018). A new index combining thermal, acoustic, and visual comfort of moderate environments in temperate climates. Building and Environment, 139, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.038
  43. Krüger, E. L., & Zannin, P. H. T. (2004). Acoustic, thermal and luminous comfort in classrooms. Building and Environment, 39(9), 1055–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.01.030
  44. Ricciardi, P., & Buratti, C. (2018). Environmental quality of university classrooms: Subjective and objective evaluation of the thermal, acoustic, and lighting comfort conditions. Building and Environment, 127, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.030
  45. Zomorodian, Z. S., Tahsildoost, M., & Hafezi, M. (2016). Thermal comfort in educational buildings: A review article. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 895–906.
  46. Pereira LD, Raimondo D, Corgnati SP, Gameiro da Silva M, Assessment of
  47. indoor air quality and thermal comfort in Portuguese secondary classrooms: methodology and results, Building and Environment (2014)

For Conference & Paper Publication​

UIJRT Publication - International Journal